Rahul Gandhi Defamation Case: HC Says Freedom of Speech Doesn’t Mean Defaming Indian Army

Lucknow, June 4 (Taaza Wire)

Rahul Gandhi Defamation Case: In a significant development, the Allahabad High Court has made it clear that freedom of speech does not include the right to make defamatory statements against the Indian Army, especially from a public platform. The court rejected Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s plea to quash summons issued by a lower court in connection with his controversial remarks during the 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra.

What the High Court Said in Rahul Gandhi Defamation Case

Justice Subhash Vidyarthi of the Lucknow Bench, in his order on May 29, said:

“Article 19(1)(a) guarantees freedom of speech and expression but the same is subject to reasonable restrictions. It does not encompass speeches defaming persons or institutions such as the Indian Army.”

The High Court sanctioned the February 2025 order by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM), issuing a summons to Rahul Gandhi under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (defamation).

The Case Against Rahul Gandhi

The complaint was made by Udai Shanker Srivastava, a retired Director of BRO (equivalent to Colonel in the Army), who charged that on December 16, 2022, Gandhi uttered derogatory comments regarding a face-off between Chinese and Indian soldiers in Arunachal Pradesh. The face-off had taken place on December 9, and Srivastava accused Gandhi of making his comments with the intention of demoralizing the Indian Army and eroding people’s confidence in its courage.

Srivastava referred to the Indian Army’s official release, dated December 12, stating that PLA soldiers were resisted with strength in the Tawang region and both sides sustained minor injuries.

Legal Arguments

Gandhi’s legal team, led by advocate Pranshu Agarwal, argued that:

• The complaint was politically motivated.
• The alleged defamatory remarks were against the Indian Army, not Srivastava individually.

But the High Court differed. It held that Srivastava, being an interested and aggrieved citizen and erstwhile Army-associated government official, possessed locus standi to institute a case under Section 199 CrPC.

Court’s Observation

The Justice Vidyarthi observed that the ACJM had exercised his mind wisely while issuing the summons. The issuance of summons was not perfunctory and was based both on the complaint as well as on witness statements.

Political Fallout and Public Reaction

The verdict comes at a time when Rahul Gandhi, now the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, has been intensifying his criticism of the Modi government on multiple fronts, including national security.

The BJP has strongly condemned Gandhi’s past remarks, alleging that he consistently undermines Indian institutions, including the armed forces. The ruling party has positioned this case as a matter of national pride and responsibility.

What This Means

The ruling of the court instills the belief that there is responsibility attached to free speech, particularly for public figures. The statements made against institutions such as the Army are not protected under the vast bracket of constitutional rights if they lead to reputational damage

Conclusion

This Rahul Gandhi defamation case highlights the thin line between political criticism and defamatory utterance. Well before the trial can begin, the clear message of the High Court is that national institutions are deserving of respect, especially from those in positions of power and influence.

Stay tuned with Taaza Wire for the latest updates on politics, defense, and national affairs.

🔍 Read more

PM Modi to Inaugurate World’s Highest Railway Arch: Chenab Bridge, Flag Off Katra-Srinagar Vande Bharat Train

PM Modi to Flag Off First Train to Kashmir on June 6: Vande Bharat to Connect Katra and Baramulla